mod_python vs mod_snake
kalle at gnupung.net
Wed Dec 12 15:39:47 CET 2001
> I've got a Python CGI performing XSLT transforms and I experience really
> poor performance because it has to import plenty of modules.
> I was then thinking using an interpreter embedded within Apache 1.3. I
> want to rely at least on a minimal application framework so I don't feel
> like using pcgi.
> Now the question is should I use mod_python or mod_snake? Both have pros
> and cons... mod_python looks more mature, more documented and has a
> much simpler architecture than mod_snake.
Not an answer to your question, but... You might want to take a look at Maki
maki is an attempt to glue together a simple, flexible framework that allows
you to use XML, XSLT, Apache, and Python to serve web pages. It is a
mod_python handler for Apache that is intended to handle requests made to your
server for XML files.
Kalle Svensson (kalle at gnupung.net) - Laziness, impatience, hubris: Pick two!
English: http://www.gnupung.net/ Svenska: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~kalle/
Stuff: ["http://www.%s.org/" % x for x in "gnu debian python emacs".split()]
More information about the Python-list