More fun with PEP 276
mcherm at destiny.com
Thu Dec 13 18:16:22 CET 2001
> p.s. And Note that PEP 276 itself (merely) suggests
> adding an iterator to class int which could exist
> independently from any or none of the above. (I know,
> we've been around that circle before, too. <wink>).
Yeah. Is there a way to express my support for the limited and
well-reasoned proposal that is in PEP 276 itself without commiting
myself at all on the broad flurry of OTHER proposals folks have made here?
-- Michael Chermside
More information about the Python-list