Comparison with Ruby ?
johann at physics.berkeley.edu
Fri Feb 23 21:28:17 CET 2001
Moshe Zadka writes:
> Numbers are numbers: I shouldn't care about how to store numbers in
> machine-level integers more then I should care how to reallocate lists.
> This PEP is a bit backwards incompatible, but in my not so humble opinion,
> I think it does have a good chance of being in Py3K.
I just read that; looks nice. Inspired by Scheme? Then again, it's
not suprising that I like it; at least someone's Python humor file
quotes me twice going off on the same issue. I'll have to be more
circumspect this time. :-)
In any case, as someone who does a lot of numerics, I've got to say
that folding this under "numbers are numbers" is unwholesome. Inexact
numbers are not exact numbers. That lets the number-crunchers use
their types happily.
Integers (fixnums) and rationals and bignums, on the other hand, are
"numbers" and there should be no walls between them.
Johann Hibschman johann at physics.berkeley.edu
More information about the Python-list