Gratuitous Change (Was: Re: "in" operator for strings)

Tim Peters tim.one at home.com
Sun Feb 4 04:43:24 CET 2001


[Chris Gonnerman]
> ...
> BTW I've lost track... is 2.1 stackless or was that just a rumor?

Can't tell you whether it was a rumor (if it was, I had not heard it), but
can tell you 2.1 is not stackless.

2.1 is registerless instead.  We were getting too many complaints that
making Python faster was disturbing carefully tuned Python delay loops
<wink>.

working-on-making-2.2-ignore-ram-and-go-straight-to-disk-ly y'rs  - tim





More information about the Python-list mailing list