Gratuitous Change (Was: Re: "in" operator for strings)
tim.one at home.com
Sun Feb 4 04:43:24 CET 2001
> BTW I've lost track... is 2.1 stackless or was that just a rumor?
Can't tell you whether it was a rumor (if it was, I had not heard it), but
can tell you 2.1 is not stackless.
2.1 is registerless instead. We were getting too many complaints that
making Python faster was disturbing carefully tuned Python delay loops
working-on-making-2.2-ignore-ram-and-go-straight-to-disk-ly y'rs - tim
More information about the Python-list