PEP status and python-dev summaries
Nathaniel Gray
n8gray at caltech.edu.is.my.email.address
Sat Feb 10 02:02:45 EST 2001
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> In article <3dg0hn8zlr.fsf at ute.cnri.reston.va.us>,
> Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin at mems-exchange.org> wrote:
>
> > Should the full text of PEPs be posted at some point?
>
> I think the text would be too long to post directly. A URL should be
> sufficient.
Many newsgroups post their entire FAQs periodically. PEPs are a few
hundred lines at most -- not a huge burden. Besides, compared to the
weekly traffic on c.l.p. a PEP is just a drop in the bucket.
To be kind to those with slow connections who may want to skip PEP texts,
they could have a distinctive subject line format, e.g.
[PEP 666 Text] Curly-Braces for Delimiting Blocks
IMO, posting the text of PEPs to the newsgroup is a no-brainer. It keeps
the users informed of the language's direction at essentially zero cost.
-n8
--
_.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._
Nathaniel Gray
California Institute of Technology
Computation and Neural Systems
n8gray <at> caltech <dot> edu
_.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._.~'^`~._
More information about the Python-list
mailing list