Web devel with python. Whats the best route?
Gerhard Häring
gerhard.nospam at bigfoot.de
Mon Jan 8 21:39:00 EST 2001
The original post most probably meant mod_python. Another Python-Apache
module is mod_snake, just to add to the confusion :-) URLs are
www.modpython.org, modsnake.sourceforge.net.
But I agree that the old-fash CGI approach is the safest bet. But a
larger web-application is much easier to program when it is a
long-running process and not a CGI script. You also don't have to open
database connections each time, load and parse config files each time.
It *can* make a noticable speed difference when there is zero startup
time in a script.
Gerhard
Lele Gaifax wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001 23:37:54 +0100, "Alex Martelli" <aleaxit at yahoo.com> said:
>
> AM> "Moshe Zadka" <moshez at zadka.site.co.il> wrote in message
> AM> news:mailman.978936788.24717.python-list at python.org... [snip]
> >> The only thing I'm pretty certain about is that PyApache has
> >> been
> AM> superseded
> >> by mod_apache. Other then that, all have strong points, so you
> >> should pick
>
> AM> I know I'm confused, but, isn't mod_apache some other Apache
> AM> module (that, I think, has something to do with configuring
> AM> the webserver itself)? How does it supersede PyApache? Tx
> AM> for clarifications on this...!
>
> It may be, in the sense that it's a superset of PyApache. Never
> checked nor used the other modules, so I may be wrong.
>
> The goal of PyApache was fast execution of standard CGIs, and that's
> it. For more esotheric capabilities, I preferred Zope.
--
Sorry for the fake email, please use the real one below to reply.
contact: g e r h a r d @ b i g f o o t . d e
web: http://highqualdev.com
More information about the Python-list
mailing list