2001 Enchancement Wishlist
Pearu Peterson
pearu at cens.ioc.ee
Thu Jan 4 05:47:41 EST 2001
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Alex Martelli wrote:
> "Raymond Hettinger" <othello at javanet.com> wrote in message
> news:3A4ECDA9.E2796F78 at javanet.com...
> [snip]
> > I was hoping to avoid a factory method or global variable or using
> > modules to create single instances. Compared to enriching __init__,
> > these approaches seem kludgy,
>
> Why would a factory function be "kludgy"? It's one of the most
> classic and useful design-patterns, and I've as yet seen NO reason
> at all, from either you or Pearu, showing this pattern as in any
> way undesirable.
For the record, I use now
class Real:
def __init__(self,num):
self.num = num
<other number class methods>
class Complex:
def __init__(self,real,imag):
self.real,self.imag = real,imag
<other number class methods>
_Complex = Complex
def Complex(real,imag):
if imag == 0:
return Real(real)
return _Complex(real,imag)
for modeling
class Complex:
def __init__(self,real,imag):
if imag == 0:
return Real(real)
self.real,self.imag = real,imag
<other number class methods>
And the idea works fine for my application. Though, any comments are
appreciated.
PS: Here Complex and Real classes are for illustration only.
Thanks,
Pearu
More information about the Python-list
mailing list