Most efficient solution?
Christopher A. Craig
com-nospam at ccraig.org
Tue Jul 17 08:25:12 EDT 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
alf at leo.logilab.fr (Alexandre Fayolle) writes:
> I suppose that the first loop could also be rewritten using map, in order
> to squeeze some more juice out of the beast:
>
> C={}
> map(lambda item,dic = C: dic[item]=1, B)
I doubt this would save you anything because the cost of that lambda
function will most likely be greater than the savings from the for
loop.
- --
Christopher A. Craig <com-nospam at ccraig.org>
"How does a project get to be a year late?
- -- One day at a time" - Frederick Brooks, Jr.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt
iEYEARECAAYFAjtULqgACgkQjVztv3T8pztPCQCfUEcjOUN7cdjQBX8GuRieA3Dr
pZ4AnRo9TobmYzQTQmRRWhNKn/JmFn2U
=IF0V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Python-list
mailing list