Pushing the standard library
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Wed Jul 4 07:04:56 EDT 2001
Gustavo Niemeyer <niemeyer at conectiva.com> writes:
> Hello Carlos!
>
> [...]
> > As it's impossible to clone an army of timbots to solve this problem, we
> > must try to find another solution. I don't believe that we can sort this
> > issue without some involvement of PythonLabs and the core Python-dev guys.
> > The problem is not lack of good modules, but lack of *standard* modules. To
> > make a module standard, some level of Python-dev commitment is a *must*.
> [...]
>
> Agreed. Indeed, I think that the first step to start this out is to
> discover which libraries currently have a poor implementation, or which
> ones should start do be developed ASAP.
shutil is pretty crappy, both in terms of interface and implementation
(it loses on the Mac, for instance). distutils.file_utils is much
better, and should probably be moved into the core.
just-my-vote-ly y'rs
m.
--
Hey, if I thought I was wrong, I'd change my mind. :)
-- Grant Edwards, comp.lang.python
More information about the Python-list
mailing list