Is this a true statement: Part III

[D-Man]

On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:40:31PM +0000, Courageous wrote:
| 
| >The thing that I found interesting about the Part II posts were the positive
| >things said about the C language.  Is C that much different than C++?  Why
| >the leaning towards C over C++?
| 
| The explosion of forms available and commonly in use in C++ gives me
| a headache. I really just want "C with classes and virtual functions," pretty

Isn't that called "Objective C"?  I read an overview and the beginning
of a tutorial once.

-D