Aahz Maruch <aahz at panix.com> wrote: > In article <9ik9kd$nch$1 at news.mathworks.com>, jcm <grumble at usa.net> wrote: >> >>If you'd like, reread my point as "muds are likely to be CPU-bound >>programs". > Fine, but in that case, what *is* your point? Muds are likely to be CPU-bound programs.