Is Python Dead?
gerhard.nospam at bigfoot.de
Mon Jul 2 08:40:10 EDT 2001
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:42:37 -0700, Edward B. Wilson II <ed at ewilson.com> wrote:
>I have been following Python for five years now, and I am still just as
>frustrated with it as I was in 1996.
>Python still doesn't have good database support, nor has it grown to be
>useful in the web space as mod_perl. PyApache has been around longer than
>mod_php, yet php has far surpassed it as a productivity tool in the web
PHP is IMHO even worse a programming language than Perl. The main difference
may be that there is a company behind PHP, whereas there are AFIK no sponsors
of mod_python and mod_snake development (you know about these and not only
about PyApache, do you?).
I have had no problems with Python's database support, yet I didn't push it to
the limits yet (only did simple stuff). There is at least one Python database
module available for any major database that I know of.
>Python needs better leadership in areas of its growth. Python is truly the
>best language in use today, except it still isn't very useful for the
>largest solution sector, database access, and information presentation (web,
There are tons of modules available for these sectors. Do you think that they
are all buggy or lack important features?
mail: gerhard <at> bigfoot <dot> de registered Linux user #64239
web: http://highqualdev.com public key at homepage
public key fingerprint: DEC1 1D02 5743 1159 CD20 A4B6 7B22 6575 86AB 43C0
reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
More information about the Python-list