Is this a true statement: Part III

[markus at kepler.ibp.de]

"MDK" <no at spam.com> writes:

> The thing that I found interesting about the Part II posts were the positive
> things said about the C language.  Is C that much different than C++?

It is smaller. Even if C has its idiosyncrasies (and it has lots of
them), one can master them in a reasonable time.

> Why the leaning towards C over C++?  I thought C++ was supposed to
> be the 'New and Improved C.'

It didn't live up to its expectations.


- Markus