More on "with" statement
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Sat Jul 14 09:23:01 CEST 2001
Roman Suzi wrote:
> > That's just plain more efficient. Four additions and one multiply
Yes, typo. Three, obviously.
> The same with "with": it could make name-resolving more efficient
> by allowing searching some namespaces ahead of locals() and
Or you could just make a temporary assignment. Same thing going on, no
need for a new keyword and ambiguous code.
Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, US / 37 20 N 121 53 W / ICQ16063900 / &tSftDotIotE
/ \ God is love, but get it in writing.
\__/ Gypsy Rose Lee
Kepler's laws / http://www.alcyone.com/max/physics/kepler/
A proof of Kepler's laws.
More information about the Python-list