Language change and code breaks
phil hunt
philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk
Thu Jul 19 19:58:23 EDT 2001
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:56:06 GMT, Nick Efford <nde at comp.leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>I can appreciate some of the arguments made in favour of a case-
>insensitive Python, but there are times when we give meaning to case
>in written English: "python" is the snake, but "Python" is the
>programming language; "latex" is a material, "LaTeX" is a markup
>language for document typesetting; "mud" is something you get on your
>shoes, but a "MUD" is something entirely different. I would much
>prefer it if Python continued to allow the distinctions we make in
>written language to be preserved when coding.
I hope you don't use identifiers that differ only in case. BTW, I
am happy to use the uncapitalised versions of all the above to
rever to the capitalised meanings.
>My other worry over case insensitivity is that it creates
>opportunities for poor style by allowing the inconsistent use
>of case.
Into bondage and discipline are we now?
--
#===== Philip Hunt == philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk ======#
Herbivore: effort-free public key encryption. See:
<http://www.vision25.demon.co.uk/oss/herbivore/intro.html>
** First software release coming soon! **
More information about the Python-list
mailing list