Language change and code breaks (fwd)
Peter Hansen
peter at engcorp.com
Fri Jul 20 07:37:46 EDT 2001
James Logajan wrote:
>
> Peter Hansen wrote:
> > 1. They are inactive in the Python community and are
> > therefore unaware of the upcoming code breakage.
> >
> > 2. Their code is dependent on the existing integer
> > division behaviour, and yet they are not amongst
> > the classes of users identified in this newsgroup
> > as being the most likely to be impacted.
> >
> > 3. They are incapable of maintaining their code,
> > and simultaneously are entirely at the mercy of
> > outside forces who may choose to upgrade them
> > against their will or without their knowledge to
> > the new and incompatible version of Python.
> >
> > Or, they are not at the mercy of outside forces,
> > yet mysteriously cannot *avoid* upgrading their
> > Python installations and thus breaking their
> > own code (which they somehow cannot maintain).
> >
> > 4. Were we to develop and make easily available to
> > them a scanner capable at least of identifying
> > the probability they will suffer code breakage,
> > they would be unable to use it, whether for
> > (1) or (3).
> >
> > Have I missed anything?
>
> I'm sure you could think of many more insults if you just tried harder. Just
> how many years have you been in commercial software development anyway?
Did you miss the thread up until this point?
I neither intended the above to be insulting nor, as far as I
can tell, *is* anything in the above insulting.
Therefore, I agree completely with you. I could *definitely*
think of more insults (than zero) if I tried.
I've been in commercial software development since roughly 1981.
(Perhaps you consider something in *this* posting insulting too.
If you do, we clearly have a different definition of insulting.
You, by the way, were obviously trying to insult me, and I honestly
have no idea why.)
--
----------------------
Peter Hansen, P.Eng.
peter at engcorp.com
More information about the Python-list
mailing list