Language change and code breaks (fwd)

James Logajan JamesL at Lugoj.Com
Fri Jul 20 04:12:11 CEST 2001


Peter Hansen wrote:
>  1. They are inactive in the Python community and are
>     therefore unaware of the upcoming code breakage.
> 
>  2. Their code is dependent on the existing integer
>     division behaviour, and yet they are not amongst
>     the classes of users identified in this newsgroup
>     as being the most likely to be impacted.
> 
>  3. They are incapable of maintaining their code,
>     and simultaneously are entirely at the mercy of
>     outside forces who may choose to upgrade them
>     against their will or without their knowledge to
>     the new and incompatible version of Python.
> 
>     Or, they are not at the mercy of outside forces,
>     yet mysteriously cannot *avoid* upgrading their
>     Python installations and thus breaking their
>     own code (which they somehow cannot maintain).
> 
>  4. Were we to develop and make easily available to
>     them a scanner capable at least of identifying
>     the probability they will suffer code breakage,
>     they would be unable to use it, whether for
>     (1) or (3).
> 
> Have I missed anything?

I'm sure you could think of many more insults if you just tried harder. Just
how many years have you been in commercial software development anyway?



More information about the Python-list mailing list