Augmented Assignment (was: Re: PEP scepticism)
thomas at xs4all.net
Fri Jul 6 23:52:28 CEST 2001
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 11:48:18AM +0000, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> writes:
> > But then you could run into trouble on, say,
> > () += y
> > because the empty tuple is shared, just like interned strings and integers.
> > The refcount *could* be 2, and you end up modifying someone else's empty
> > tuple.
> No, because "() += y" is syntactically illegal.
x = ()
x += y
is not, and that's exactly what I meant.
Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
More information about the Python-list