Is this a true statement: Part III
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 3 14:33:24 CEST 2001
"MDK" <no at spam.com> wrote in message
news:9hsckg$4rt$1 at taliesin.netcom.net.uk...
> Ok, I rescind my previous conclusion that the answer to this question,
> "Python can do everything C++ can do but just slower." is "Excluding
> device drivers the answer is a clear yes."
> The thing that I found interesting about the Part II posts were the
> things said about the C language. Is C that much different than C++? Why
C-89 is basically a subset of C++. C-99 isn't, but I doubt many of
us have yet any significant experience with C-99 (no fully compliant
compilers yet, for example).
> the leaning towards C over C++? I thought C++ was supposed to be the 'New
> and Improved C.'
C is simpler than C++, since the latter does everything the former
does plus much, MUCH more. If one values simplicity enough (or,
to put it differently, if one abhors complications badly enough)
then I guess one may hate C++ while tolerating C. I don't really
agree myself (I do loathe complication, but C++ gives me top speed
AND the possibility reasonably high-level programming at the same
time, and I really have no alternative when I do need both).
More information about the Python-list