Obsolesence of <>
aahz at panix.com
Fri Jun 1 03:40:29 CEST 2001
In article <mailman.991352942.30691.python-list at python.org>,
Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote:
>FWIW. I'm not really sure I like the change Alex points to. It makes
>something like the below fail:
> l = [(1+1j),(2-2j),Klass(),Klass(),Klass,5,4,3,'c','b','a']
>In a list like this, many of the comparisons have no particular meaning.
>I have no idea whether an instance of Klass is more than a complex
>number. And in most cases, I don't even have any idea whether one
>instance is meaningfully greater than another. But it is nice to have
>everything have some arbitrary inequality relation in order to create
>partial orderings on the subsets of things that really do have an order.
>It makes perfect sense to me to want the numbers and strings to occur in
>order, even while not caring exactly -where- in the sorted list they
>occur as a sublist.
Yup, this used to work. Then came Unicode....
--- Aahz <*> (Copyright 2001 by aahz at pobox.com)
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
"Characters exist to suffer, you know. An author needs a little sadism
in her makeup." --Brenda Clough
More information about the Python-list