Meta: PEP discussion (was Re: PEP 255: Simple Generators)

[James_Althoff at i2.com]

Tim Peters wrote:
<snip>
>Some implementations of Icon work that way, but they've used several
>approaches over the years.  In no case did they expose any of the
internals,
>though.  We didn't *have* to expose Python's generator-iterator object
>either, but doing so adds (IMO) significant power over Icon's generators
--
>and it's more Pythonic to do so anyway.

I agree.  Thanks for an excellent decision!  :-)

Jim