the definition of "strong" (was Re: Why isn't Python king of the hill?)
steven at haryan.to
Thu Jun 7 10:34:39 CEST 2001
Sorry for bringing back an oldish post, but how does one define
"strong typing" and "weak typing" vs "static typing" and "dynamic
typing"? I've always thought that Python has _strong_ typing,
but it is not static. So it is unlike Perl which has weak and
dynamic typing (although under -w Perl will issue warnings if
you try to mix string and numeric in expressions).
I would say _static_ typing is the one that will make me sleep
better, because once I tell the compiler that my foo variable is
an int, it will stay an int through the course of execution.
At 25/05/2001 04:54, Richard P. Muller wrote:
>Something about preaching to the choir comes to mind, here...
>In any case, most of the people in this newsgroup (myself very much
>included) would agree with you on improved productivity in Python.
>That being said, there are some advantages to Java. It's built into
>almost every web browser on the net. Hard to overstate the importance of
>being everywhere. Jython is getting close to putting Python everywhere
>that Java is, but (IMHO) one loses some of the simplicity of Python
>along the way. Moreover, Java is strongly typed. Sure, you can staple
>strong typing into Python, but having it there all the time occasionally
>lets one sleep better. Finally, and probably most importantly, managers
>who know nothing about programming have some vague feeling that Java is
>a good thing.
More information about the Python-list