PEP 255: Simple Generators

[Toby Dickenson]

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak at knm.org.pl> wrote:

>I agree that it's strange, but I prefer the PEP's syntax to any of
>the alternatives that were proposed. Because each proposal introduced
>a new pseudo-keyword or new syntax instead of reusing existing syntax
>in some intuitive way.

The PEP is already introducing one new keyword, and therefore needs
some __future__ magic. Is needing two new keywords worse than needing
one?


Toby Dickenson
tdickenson at geminidataloggers.com