is and == (is not other_thread)
not.this at seebelow.org
Thu Mar 1 05:33:19 CET 2001
I've had a few of my own little questions about "is" and "==", vis-a-vis
1) Are two strings that are equal in the "==" sense always guaranteed to
be equal in the "is" sense? Experiments I have done with the
interactive intepreter show (anecdotally, at least) that equal strings
always "is" the same, but if that's due to caching, I guess it's not
guaranteed. (Not to mention the fact that I've found no promise in the
docs to this effect. <wink>)
2) Is "is" faster than "==" for strings? Of hand, it would seem so.
That's why I'm tempted to use it for string equality. (OTOH, if strings
can be "==" equal without being "is" equal, than I guess that's wildly
false economy. <wink>)
3) Internally, does "==" for strings always begin with an "is"
operation? (If two variables are bound to the same string, there's no
conceptual need to do the [presumably] slower operation of
character-by-character string comparison.) If so, I guess string "=="
would be nearly as fast as string "is" in many cases.
Grant R. Griffin g2 at dspguru.com
Publisher of dspGuru http://www.dspguru.com
Iowegian International Corporation http://www.iowegian.com
More information about the Python-list