m.faassen at vet.uu.nl
Sat May 26 16:05:19 CEST 2001
Nick Perkins <nperkins7 at home.com> wrote:
>>>..write code almost as fast as you can type.
>>..with Python I can stay in the flow longer.
> Funny, I was just thinking about this today. I remember being told about a
> guy who would code in VB, just typing almost continuously at ~40wpm. This
> was intended to impress me, but made me wonder what that code looked like?
Me too. Tell us if you find any samples. :)
> I think that Python is especially well suited to eliminating any and all
> repetetive typing. I find that the more I think about and refine a program,
> the shorter it gets! ( I haven't experienced that in other languages )
I've had the same experience, though it happens in other languages as well.
But perhaps not as easily.
> I am curious about how long most programmers 'stay in the flow'.
> Personally, I rarely type more than, maybe, 3 lines at a time before
> stopping to think again. Sometimes it's much less,
> but rarely more. I suppose it also depends on your definition of 'stopping
> to think'. You might think for 2 seconds, or several minutes.
I work in much the same way; type a few lines, stop, think. Erase lines
again. :). If it's a common idion I may type more lines, like in
the 1.5.2 idiom:
result = 
for line in lines:
line = string.strip(line)
# or do more stuff here
In 2.0 and up this can often be a list comprehension.
> I can recall typing many lines of Java or COBOL without really thinking, but
> that's because there was no way around it, you pretty much had to 'follow
> the pattern'. In Python, there always is a way to improve repetetive code.
Agreed. I dislike repetitive code; it's boring and time consuming so I
spend inordinate amounts of time avoiding it. :)
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
More information about the Python-list