Why no number methods?

Stephen Hansen news at myNOSPAM.org
Tue May 15 04:27:13 EDT 2001


"Magnus Lie Hetland" <mlh at idi.ntnu.no> wrote in message >
> It's online at O'Reilly's website. (No URL handy...)
>
> He says that Python 3000 is a *long* way off. Whether that means that
> the type/class gap will stay open far into the future is another
> matter :)
>

    I do believe i'ver read, somewhere, that 'Python 3000' was just a catch
all name that meant, '... the future ...', and not any planned project that
will be taking place. Meaning, that its a "things that we dream or imagine
accomplishing in the not immediate future" thing.

--S





More information about the Python-list mailing list