Is Stackless Python DEAD?
frederic.giacometti at arakne.com
Mon Nov 5 03:13:00 CET 2001
"Martin von Loewis" <loewis at informatik.hu-berlin.de> wrote in message
news:j4zo6cixu2.fsf at informatik.hu-berlin.de...
> "Bruce Dodson" <bruce_dodson at bigfoot.com> writes:
> > Would Stackless have a better chance of making it into the core if its
> > initial PEP talked only about increasing performance and removing limits
> > recursion?
> No. It is not the feature set that prevents its incorporation; it is
> the implementation strategy chosen. The patch is too intrusive.
This words seems to point out that the actual reason is not technical...
This is definitely not a word from the realm of engineering, but more from
someone sense of his core self being disturbed by an outsider.
Am I right ?
More information about the Python-list