Benefits of moving from Python to Common Lisp?

Kenny Tilton ktilton at nyc.rr.com
Sun Nov 11 22:58:07 CET 2001


The Strout piece is pretty bad. 

First, the whole idea of arbitrarily picking assessment categories and
then arbitrarily picking numbers 0 to 10 and then arbitrarily assigning
weight...fuggedaboutit.

Second, looks like the assessment was done by someone trying to justify
a switch to Python.

Third, no mention of performance, and "OO is outside the scope of this
evaluation"?!

fourth, Python syntax wins by 10 to 2 on syntax,producing half the
difference in the numeric ranking? Puh-leaze.

fifth, 30 points for open source? hello, CMUCL?

Python wins on expressiveness? Without macros?

I would go with the Norvig piece.

kenny
clinisys

"Morten W. Petersen" wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm currently doing some research, to see if it could be an advantage to
> use Common Lisp instead of Python (currently Python and Zope [1] are used
> to build web applications).
> 
> While doing this, Google has provided two interesting documents (search
> for 'lisp vs python'):
> 
>   http://www.strout.net/python/pythonvslisp.html
>   http://www.norvig.com/python-lisp.html
> 
> First off, to save everyone some time, I'm wondering if there are more
> papers documenting the difference between the two;  if there aren't any,
> I'd like to continue the discussion and summarize the findings in a paper
> accessible on the net.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Morten
> 
> [1] http://www.zope.org



More information about the Python-list mailing list