A modest indentation proposal

[Erann Gat]

In article <slrna0fv3m.2ke.grey at teleute.dmiyu.org>,
morpheus at here.not.there wrote:

>     It is not backwards compatible if it solves your problem and if it is it
> doesn't solve your problem.  As you can see in the second test the first line
> does not denote the end of the block because of the semicolon at the end.
> This is legal now.  Under your proposal it would become illegal breaking
> compatibility.

No, it would not become "illegal" under my proposal.  Please go back and
re-read what I wrote, and pay particular attention to the word "optional".

E.