Is Stackless Python DEAD?

[A.M. Kuchling]

On Mon, 05 Nov 2001 02:13:00 GMT, 
	Frederic Giacometti <frederic.giacometti at arakne.com> wrote:
>This words seems to point out that the actual reason is not technical...
>This is definitely not a word from the realm of engineering, but more from
>someone sense of his core self being disturbed by an outsider.

Not at all.  Stackless would have ramifications not just for a few
files in the core, but also for all the extension modules that come
with Python and for all the authors of third-party extension modules.
In terms of number of files affected, "intrusive" isn't a bad word to
describe the Stackless patches.

--amk