Why not 3.__class__ ?
michael at rcp.co.uk
Tue Oct 9 18:14:54 CEST 2001
Paul Rubin <phr-n2001d at nightsong.com> wrote in
news:7x4rp8q1cy.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com:
> Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes:
>> Marcin, I don't understand why you care so much about being able to
>> write 3.foo. It's painful to fix in the lexer, and probably leads to
>> less useful error messages if someone makes a mistake in a float
>> literal (e.g. "3.e 0"). And I see zero use for it: in practice, you
>> will never ask for 3.foo -- you'll ask for x.foo where x happens to
>> contain the value 3.
> How about (3).foo?
Or even 3 .foo?
More information about the Python-list