> x = if e1 then e2 else e3
[Emile van Sebille]
> Would this fully short circuit evaluation of e2 if not e1
Of course. It would be "the same as"
if e1:
__unspellable_name__ = e2
else:
__unspellable_name__ = e3
x = __unspellable_name__
> (and vv)?
It wouldn't evaluate "vv" at all <wink>.
nor-is-it-limited-to-"x"-etc-ly y'rs - tim