The status of xmllib
sholden at holdenweb.com
Thu Sep 27 18:10:31 CEST 2001
"Depracated" is a specific warning that the functionality could disappear in
a future release without further notice. In other words, don't use it for
new projects, and start to think about converting existing ones, as this
will likely become necessary.
"Magnus Lie Hetland" <mlh at idi.ntnu.no> wrote in message
news:9oujbu$4pp$1 at tyfon.itea.ntnu.no...
> What exactly does the following statement from the
> documentation (section 13.12, xmllib) mean?
> Deprecated since release 2.0. Use xml.sax instead.
> I understand that it encourages people not to use
> xmllib, and to use xml.sax... But does it mean that
> xmllib will be phased out in the long run? In that
> case, is a pure-Python plug-in for xml.sax planned?
> If xmllib is here to stay (although not as good as
> the xml package), perhaps deprecated is a bit strong?
> Or am I just being nervous about it?
> And, if no pure-Python handler for xml.sax (or
> xml.anything) exists -- would a submitted module
> stand a chance of being included? (Not that I have one,
> but if it would be used, I might write one...)
> - Magnus (who wants an xml package which doesn't strain
> the poor users with compiling and installing expat)
> Magnus Lie Hetland http://www.hetland.org
> "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in
> it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
More information about the Python-list