Why not 3.__class__ ?

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk qrczak at knm.org.pl
Mon Sep 17 14:35:20 CEST 2001


Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:02:25 +0200, Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> pisze:

> But tokenizing "3.whatever" as anything different from a "3." token
> followed by a "whatever" token would break backwards compatibility

Is there any case in the grammar when a literal is directly followed
by an identifier?

>>>> 3.and 4
> 4

Here it's not an identifier but a keyword.

-- 
 __("<  Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak at knm.org.pl http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
 \__/
  ^^                      SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK



More information about the Python-list mailing list