PEP 287: reStructuredText Standard Docstring Format
Richard Jones
rjones at ekit-inc.com
Tue Apr 2 21:05:05 EST 2002
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:53, Peter Hansen wrote:
> I would suggest an even shorter version of the quickref, focused on
> only those items needed in 80% of embedded documentation. It does
> _look_ complicated at first.
I agree - I think the quickref definitely needs:
1. reorganising to filter the most common, simple markup to the top, and
2. much higher status/metioning on the ReST website.
> [snip discussion of more complex documentation and appropriate formats]
> But why would anyone want to embed such complex documentation?
As mentioned in another response, I'm actually using ReST to document Roundup
outside of the code modules. I fully expect that one day (when platypus is up
to it) to be able to produce PDF documentation from the ReST source. That'll
be _neat_ :)
Of course, if you want to get really complicated, Frame/DocBook is the only
way to go :)
I already write my slide presentations using ReST - it's converted to
PythonPoint XML and from there to PDF. Very nice, and as simple as can be :)
Richard
More information about the Python-list
mailing list