Mailman vs References: (was Re: How to make regexes faster? ( Python v. OmniMark))

[Aahz]

In article <mailman.1019430519.32535.python-list at python.org>,
Delaney, Timothy <tdelaney at avaya.com> wrote:
> From: aahz at pythoncraft.com [mailto:aahz at pythoncraft.com]
>> In article <mailman.1019363618.25367.python-list at python.org>,
>> Tim Peters  <tim.one at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>[Erno Kuusela]
>>>>
>>>> maybe mailman could be hacked to fake a "references" header based
>>>> on "in-reply-to".
>>>
>>>Barry won't do that. 
>> 
>> You sure?  Last time I talked to him about it a couple of years ago, he
>> said he'd at least consider it if I gave him a patch.
>
>Make sure it also goes the other way ... "In-reply-to:" is created from a
>"References:" header.

Nope.  Many MUAs understand References: and I am *not* going to take any
chances on mucking with headers that don't absolutely need it.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

What if there were no rhetorical questions?