Yeah whatever... (was RE: PEP 285: Adding a bool type)

[gbreed at cix.compulink.co.uk]

Ken Seehof wrote:

> Sorry, I just don't get why this is relevant.  Let's try to keep this
> discussion in the real world, ok?

The real world's no fun.  A peek at the types module shows that Python 
already has 33 fundamental types, which means there are already 
33!=8683317618811886495518194401280000000 ways of combining them by this 
strange factorial rule.  It's trivial to show that Python is already 
impossible to use as a programming language.  Unless perhaps we can all 
give ourselves super intelligence as well.


                      Graham