explicit is better, BUT... (was Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type)
Andy Gimblett
gimbo at ftech.net
Mon Apr 15 05:06:39 EDT 2002
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:31:01PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Tim Peters wrote:
> >
> > As originally posted, they were the "20 Pythonic Theses". They
> > never need revision, because I only gave 19 -- the 20th (or
> > perhaps the first -- they weren't numbered) was left open for
> > Guido to fill in.
>
> Perhaps it should be "19 Pythonic theses is sufficient."
Surely the gap is just another Spanish Inquisition reference?
-Andy
--
Andy Gimblett - Programmer - Frontier Internet Services Limited
Tel: 029 20 820 044 Fax: 029 20 820 035 http://www.frontier.net.uk/
Statements made are at all times subject to Frontier's Terms and
Conditions of Business, which are available upon request.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list