Asynchronous cgi that returns nothing. Possible? O:-)
Fernando RodrÃguez
frr at easyjob.net
Wed Apr 24 03:18:28 EDT 2002
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 02:17:01 -0000, Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet at unequivocal.co.uk>
wrote:
>In article <rphbcu8qlh4qgc1eonmrgts5ug7nv0u41v at 4ax.com>, Fernando RodrÃguez wrote:
>> No. Step (b) processes the order and does give feedback. Step (a) saves in a
>> db some info conatined in a cookie (date of first visit and first referrer). I
>> want step (a) to be seamless.
>
>Must admit I don't have a clue what you mean. Why aren't scripts (a)
>and (b) in the same script?
Because I can't. Step (b) is a url to a third party payment processing company
and it's no tunder my control.
> If they really must be separate scripts,
>why doesn't script (a) just output nothing at all to stdout?
I didn't try it, but I think the browser wouldn't like a cgi url that doesn't
return any html content, no? O:-)
-----------------------
Fernando Rodriguez
More information about the Python-list
mailing list