What has PEP 285 done to us?

Sandy Norton sandskyfly at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 10 19:30:20 EDT 2002


Lumberjack wrote 

> Amazing to see so much slow learning taking place. So why don't you all do 
> it again some time. Like the next PEP and the next one and the next one, 
> and so on ad infinitum. Just like previous PEPs. The old Chinese water 
> torture would be more humane than continuing these unending so-called 
> "enhancements" to the language. Drip drip drip... Neither you nor Guido 
> have a clue; unless this is his secret plan to destroy the appeal of Python 
> by setting Python programmers at each other's throats, or they begin to 
> associate emotional discord with the language and decide to keep their 
> distance. If so, the plan is well executed.
> 
> People aren't going to change, so Guido needs to adjust to the reality of 
> the political consequences of his current strategy.

Trollshit.

If you don't have faith in Guido's and Tim's judgement calls why don't
you buzz off and create your own language.

Sandy



More information about the Python-list mailing list