Could Python supplant Java?
tanzer at swing.co.at
Fri Aug 23 09:01:58 CEST 2002
brueckd at tbye.com wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Bo M. Maryniuck wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 August 2002 21:28, James J. Besemer wrote:
> > > with one 150K LOC VC++ project I worked on I could change a few modules and
> > > rebuild in just a few seconds. In contrast, I just generated a fairly
> > > trivial 150K Python program and it took almost 3 minutes compile (on a
> > > machine 4X faster than I used for that C++ project).
> > What you mean by "compile"? Python is an interpterer as Java or Perl...
> I believe he meant that it took 3 minutes to generate all the .pyc files.
I think James compared apples and oranges by comparing a single 150k
LOC file of Python to lots of little C++ modules. Python is rather
slow when compiling huge .py Files.
Ever tried feeding VC++ with a single 150k LOC C++ file, James? I
remember well an application where a 11k LOC file generated by byacc
would take far longer to compile than all the other 193 files
(containing 60 kLOC) combined.
> This is misleading though because in Python you almost never need 'rebuild
> all' functionality (exceptions include generating .pyc's for
> distribution/packaging or generating .pyc's because you're installing
> Python as root and others won't have write access to those directories).
> In a statically typed language the change to source code in one file can
> trigger the recompile of many other files (e.g. change a header file), so
> the time recquired to compile and link can be significant. In a
> dynamically typed language like Python, however, only the files that you
> actually change need to be recompiled.
All true. But then it doesn't really matter as James obviously doesn't
know what he's talking about, anyway.
Christian Tanzer tanzer at swing.co.at
Glasauergasse 32 Tel: +43 1 876 62 36
A-1130 Vienna, Austria Fax: +43 1 877 66 92
More information about the Python-list