Draft Pep (was: Re: Let's Talk About Lambda Functions!)
johnroth at ameritech.net
Tue Aug 6 14:44:29 CEST 2002
"Terry Reedy" <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote in message
news:Q7y39.76426$vg.2925921 at bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> "Bryan Olson" <fakeaddress at nowhere.org> wrote in message
> news:3D4E2E87.9070308 at nowhere.org...
> > I tried to do that in a previous response. Python should have a
> > procedure builder which does not assign the procedure to a name,
> > procedure in Python are first-class values and do not have intrinsic
> > names.
> All objects in Python are first class, at least in most regards
> (exceptions?). Most do not have names as a property of the object.
> They either do not need one or there is not an obvious candidate. But
> there are three exceptions -- functions (usually), classes, and
> modules. The purpose is to provide a string representation that
> directs one to the source code that defined the object, since this is
> usually what one wants instead of a literal representation of the
> object as with numbers, strings, and containers.
Thank you. A very useful clarification. However, if that's the
case, wouldn't it be better if whatever was stored (at least for
classes and functions) was a simple pointer into the file to where
it was defined?
More information about the Python-list