Could Python supplant Java?

Bo M. Maryniuck b.maryniuk at forbis.lt
Wed Aug 21 12:13:02 CEST 2002


On Wednesday 21 August 2002 11:54, Gerhard Häring wrote:
> Compile time - I measured Visual C++ is faster, and my feeling is that
> Borland C++ and Intel C++ are faster, too (and freely available for at
> least noncommercial use).

I'm wondering how to use Visual C++ (shortly always called "WC") under Linux. 
Concerning Borderland C++ you're right about *compile* time, but *runtime* 
there is horrible. Probably it is slowest (and most bloated) compiler over 
the world. ;-) And example is Delphi, Borderland C++ Builder and all 
Kylix'es. Last one (Kylix) produses modules for Apache, which is so ugly, so 
bloated and so slow. OTOH, I know nothing about Kylix 3... Maybe it is better 
a little for today...

-- 
Regards, Bogdan

If something has not yet gone wrong then it would ultimately have been
beneficial for it to go wrong.





More information about the Python-list mailing list