Could Python supplant Java?
bdesth at nospam.free.fr
Sat Aug 24 07:10:18 CEST 2002
> laotseu <bdesth at nospam.free.fr> wrote in message news:<3D6440C9.6080303 at nospam.free.fr>...
>>Or implements the 42 and a half methods of a IFile interface, even if
>>your code just expects to use *one* particular method of this interface.
> Adapters? Abstract classes?
Still more code that dont make code more readable ( IMHO !-)
>>And it's far to rigid an interface hierarchy, and way far to much
>>useless code to write.
> Ah yes - but at least you know the implementation isn't
> half written. ;-)
Really ? Having 41 and a half methods with no code is a fully written
Ok, I wont go much more in it. The mains points are that
- I don't agree with you when you say that dynmaic typing makes a
language only suitable for scripting. There are enough counter exemples
(in Lisp and Objective C at least) to prove this is wrong.
- I dont agree with you when you say that static typing is safer.
Counter exemples exists in C.
Now going back to something more productive !-)
> -FISH- ><>
More information about the Python-list