[snake-farm] Re: 2.2.x backports of 2.3.x new features?

[Michael Hudson]

Simon Brunning <SBrunning at trisystems.co.uk> writes:

> > From:	Peter Hansen [SMTP:peter at engcorp.com]
> > Bool is another YES, although we're getting along fine just redefining
> > our standard (true,false) = (1,0) to be (True, False) = (1,0)
> > everywhere...
>  
> Bool seems to have made it into 2.2.2 as well...

Sorta.  There's no bool type, but bool, True and False are now
builtins that are (or return) plain old ints.

This was in 2.2.1 as well.

Cheers,
M.

-- 
  Our Constitution never promised us a good or efficient government,
  just a representative one. And that's what we got.
      -- http://www.advogato.org/person/mrorganic/diary.html?start=109