Autocoding project proposal.

[Timothy Rue]

On 08-Feb-02 20:44:34 Peter Seebach <seebs at plethora.net> wrote:
>In article <2106.802T789T14243611threeseas at earthlink.net>,
>Timothy Rue <threeseas at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>C# is a subtopic of .NET / Mono, as is many other programing languages,
>>including Python.

>Unless, of course, you use that to build *your* framework.  They need
>options.  Give them some.

Who needs options?

>>The community you speak of is not inclusive of the end user/consumer, but
>>rather a community of programmers that are likley to follow MS mindset
>>programming.

>I think it's safe to say they're the community most likely to accept your
>vision.

Or the community most likely to mimic it and try and shoot it down. MS has
all the bucks to bullshit the public into believing what ever it is they
want the public to believe. Embrase and extend right?

>>If you have never done it all the way right, how will you know when you
>>do?

>How would you know?  You never really know; you simply observe that your
>current model covers everything you've seen.

???? You assume what I've presented is a model that I've come up with and
based on only what I've seen? You are greatly mistaken and in such, you
also expose a bit of C# mindset. If you are to be an example of the
Acceptance of what I present, then you are only accepting what you want
to believe, not what is.

I don't like MS and I don't have a C# compiler for any of my systems and I
am not going to sign any damn NDA or anti-gpl or such nonsense just so I
can spend more of my time and money supporting some another damn overly
complicated programming language that the typical consumer doesn't have
the time or resources or interest to deal with.

There are over three thousand programming language. The VIC is not
programming language dependant and as such I don't see any reason for me
to learn another language, because there is always going to be someone
that says what you do about some other language. I'm sure the VIC could be
written in many different languages, so? What is important is having it
written in a language that is widely (cross platform) available and freely
available. C# doesn't fit that spec. but it doesn't mean the VIC can't be
used to generate C# code.

I'm in/on usenet where there is an unbiased date time stamped archiving
machinery attachability (important in legal matters). I'm not hiding from
anyone, not even C# and MS. And I'm fully aware that People such as Steve
Jobs and Bill Gates do in fact access such, though usually behind a mask
for more than for the reason of celebraty issues.

BUT YOU HAVEN'T NAMED A USENET C# NEWSGROUP, HAVE YOU?

I have no fear of going into such a newsgroup. But then that is not what
you are suggesting, is it? You really want me to just leave here and maybe
go behind some damned closed door mailing list that has no inherent
assurence that it can provided any unbiased date time stamped public
accessible archive.

Name your favorite C# usenet newsgroup. If you pick a moderated one, then
you pick a censored one, and you will not know the truth from it.

I have no reason to believe what I present will have any different effect
on such a group of people as it apparently has here. You should think
about that.

But lets find out! Name a unmoderated Usenet C# newsgroup.



---
*3 S.E.A.S - Virtual Interaction Configuration (VIC) - VISION OF VISIONS!*
   *~ ~ ~      Advancing How we Perceive and Use the Tool of Computers!*
Timothy Rue      What's *DONE* in all we do?  *AI PK OI IP OP SF IQ ID KE*
Email @ mailto:timrue at mindspring.com      >INPUT->(Processing)->OUTPUT>v
Web @ http://www.mindspring.com/~timrue/  ^<--------<----9----<--------<