Status of PEP's?
scarblac at pino.selwerd.nl
Thu Feb 28 12:21:23 CET 2002
Fernando Pérez <fperez528 at yahoo.com> wrote in comp.lang.python:
> Python is a general purpose language, not one to be used only by number
> theorists. Putting at a level as basic as the integers a convention which
> allows things like 'for i in 3' to be valid iteration code really sounds
> bizarre and counter intuitive to me.
> But maybe it's just me.
It's not just you.
I believe syntax like 'for i in 5:' is confusing (at first sight I'd think
that i would get one value, 5), and has no merit except saving a few key
strokes compared to 'for i in range(5):', which is clearer as well.
for i in 6: print i
for i in 6,7: print i
for i in 6,7,8: print i
You wouldn't think the first line does something different, would you?
More information about the Python-list