Is Stackless Python DEAD?

[Christian Tismer]

Michael Hudson wrote:

> Christian Tismer <tismer at tismer.com> writes:
...

>>There must be a simple path. The scheme is always the same.
>>
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
>>See the split of functions in stackless map. I hope to find
>>a macro set that can create this mess from a couple of fragments.
>>
> 
> But C is ****so**** unexpressive on this level.
> 
> #define STACKLESS_CALL(FUNC, ARGTUPLE) \
>  { PyFrameObject* f = PyFrame_New(); f.next = FUNC; \
>    f.nextargs = ARGTUPLE; f.return_to = ???; return; }
> 
> You could probably do it in Lisp.


Haah! Got it!
I could probably do it in Python. Why do we have this
wonderful language. I can put some comments into the source
which can be understood by a Python script. This script is
then run over the source and spits out the necessary C code.

Grübel, Denk  -- chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware  :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26                  :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14163 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
PGP Fingerprint       E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15  D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
      where do you want to jump today?   http://www.stackless.com/