Sourceforge or Savannah or ...
erno-news at erno.iki.fi
Mon Jan 28 17:02:29 CET 2002
In article <slrna596m6.8e4.philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk>,
philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk (phil hunt) writes:
| On 27 Jan 2002 20:04:20 +0200, Erno Kuusela <erno-news at erno.iki.fi> wrote:
|| one difference i've noticed is that sourceforge has a terrible
|| mailing list archive system (geocrawler or somesuch) whereas savannah
|| uses pipermail.
| Do you have any experience with pipermail?
it works, and is very simple, and it is comfortable to use.
look in eg. <URL: http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/gcl-devel/>.
doesn't handle mime very well unless it's been fixed recently
(attachments & quoted-unreadable encoding).
mhonarc has more features. www.mail-archive.com offers free
mailing list archiving using mhonarc, but it sometimes lags
a few days.
More information about the Python-list