mhammond at skippinet.com.au
Thu Jan 24 04:42:17 CET 2002
Alois Goller wrote:
> I try to compile Python 2.1.2 under Windows with WITH_PYMALLOC defined. This
> works fine, but I read that there might be problems with python extensions.
> Well, I want to use win32api and win32con in my code, too.
I've never tried, but would be interested to hear any results. I can't
be bothered rebuilding my entire world just to try :)
> Neil Schemenauer wrote:
>>Using pymalloc with threads should be safe as long as you don't have
>>extensions that call pymalloc without the big lock held.
> How do I see whether "the big lock" is held? Can I use Mark Hammond's win32
> extensions together with WITH_PYMALLOC ?
The win32 extensions *should* work fine here. They generally grab the
lock before doing much at all. Further, a quick look at PyMalloc shows
it doesn't attempt to redefine any non-Python memory allocators (such as
global new or free) so should be perfectly fine.
However, the way I see it, that would make PyMalloc just as thread-safe
as Python itself; the GIL should be held before calling any Python
functions, including explicit or implicit object creation or destruction.
More information about the Python-list